Introduction
Within the M2030 PCF builder, PCFs can be built at an individual SKU level, or a category level. Category level PCF requests can be responded to in numerous ways, depending on the data that your organization has available.
This article will help you to:
- Understand the different approaches to Category PCFs that can be used within the M2030 builder
- Decide which approach to building a Category level PCF in the M2030 platform is most suitable, based on the data your organization has available
Individual vs. Category PCFs
|
💡 Understanding the type of PCF your customer is requesting is important to make your build as efficient as possible whilst also delighting your customers and improving your relationship. |
Individual PCFA PCF value that represents the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the lifecycle of a specific individual product, from raw material extraction to the point at which the product leaves the factory gate. Your customer may request a named product or a SKU code. |
Category PCFA PCF value that represents the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a group of sold products. Your customer may request a PCF for their own definition of a group of products so ensure you clarify which products they are referring to, so you cover the correct scope. |
Category PCF Scenarios
Given the many independent factors that can affect the type of category PCF you create, the M2030 guidance offers two distinct options for building a category level PCF.
Scenario 1 | Averaged Weightings
-
This scenario is applicable when there are known/ expected significant differences in emissions intensities among products within a category, or if weighted activity data is available across the products within the product category.​ -
âž• Benefits
- Improved accuracy in emissions representation - account for variations in emissions intensities across products by weighting material inputs and activity data according to sold volumes, offering a more realistic category-level footprint.
- Alignment with market activity - reflect actual market conditions of the category by emphasizing the unique contribution of each product, higher-volume products, which dominate the category’s overall environmental impact.
- Streamlined reporting - simplify emissions reporting by providing one consolidated PCF per category, making it easier to communicate results.
âž– Limitations
- Data dependency - requires accurate and comprehensive activity data (e.g., sold volumes) across all products in the category, which can be challenging to obtain.
- Reduced granularity - producing a single PCF for the category will obscure SKU-specific insights, which would be needed for SKU-targeted improvements or external benchmarking.
- Improved accuracy in emissions representation - account for variations in emissions intensities across products by weighting material inputs and activity data according to sold volumes, offering a more realistic category-level footprint.
-
How to build: Add all material inputs from the products within the category into the M2030 PCF builder. Weight material inputs and activity data by sold volumes. ​​
​Output: One PCF per product category​, which will represent a weighted average across all the individual products in the category.
Guidance: Ensure to reflect the scenario chosen in the product description, by listing the relevant products that are being accounted for within the category.
Scenario 2 | Representative Product
-
This approach is suitable if all products in the category are expected to have similar emissions intensities, or weighted activity data is not available across products within a category.​ -
âž• Benefits
- Efficiency - save time and resources by representing product categories instead of individual products.
- Scalability across product portfolios - enable rapid and broad application for large product ranges or complex supply chains.
- Strategic insights for category level decarbonization - identify high-impact categories to prioritize emission reductions
âž– Limitations
- Reduced accuracy - as proxies rely on generalized data, which may not capture product-specific variations or unique supply chain details.
- Potential misrepresentation - may oversimplify emissions, leading to over- or under-estimations that could misinform decisions or reporting.
- Hinders granular insights - lacks the detail needed for precise product-level improvements or differentiation in sustainability efforts.
- Efficiency - save time and resources by representing product categories instead of individual products.
-
How to build: Select a representative product to create a PCF which will represent the category. This representative product acts as a "proxy" product for the category.
Output: One category level PCF representing the product category.
Guidance: Ensure to select the PCF is for a "group of similar products" in the product set up, and reflect the scenario chosen in the product description, by writing that it is a representative product for [name of the category].
Choosing a scenario
Which category-level PCF scenario should I choose?
- Scenario 1: Averaged Weightings
Choose this and follow the in-platform guidance above, if you have input data weighted by the volumes of each product in the category. - Scenario 2: Representative Product
Choose this and follow the in-platform guidance above if you do not have weighted input data. Select a single product that best represents the category, or the product in the category which has the highest supplied volume.
- Input data - key data points needed to complete the builder
- Emission intensities - the amount of GHG produced in production